ResearchBuddyAI · Engineering

How the tools work

← Back to app

Every tool we ship runs against multiple independent AI models and only surfaces findings they agree on. These are the design choices behind that decision, and what each tool actually does at the pipeline level.

Flagship·System·8 min read

How Verify Citations catches fabricated and retracted references

Every reference in your paper resolved live against three independent citation databases. What single-model AI misses, source consensus catches.

Read the piece →
Core system·Architecture·12 min read

Deep Audit: multi-pass, triple-model paper evaluation

Two independent review passes across three models, grounded in prior work retrieval, synthesized by a Reviewer 2 persona. Six analyses, one authoritative report.

Read the piece →
Method·Method·10 min read

AI Peer Review: three role-based reviewers and how the meta-reviewer resolves them

A Methodologist, Domain Expert, and Editor run in parallel — each mapped to a distinct model. When they disagree, the meta-reviewer defers to the more critical read. Here's why.

Read the piece →
Try it

Your first task is free — no card, no credits needed. Point it at your latest draft and read the source-consensus banner in the report; that's the whole thesis, made visible.

Start free →